The Chief Executive Officer of United Airlines, Scott Kirby, proposed the potential merger of his airline with American Airlines during a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House in late February, according to sources with direct knowledge of the discussion.
The conversation took place on February 25, toward the end of a scheduled meeting focused on the future of Dulles International Airport. The merger idea was introduced informally but carried significant implications, given the scale of both carriers and their dominance in global aviation.
A combination of United and American would represent the largest consolidation in the airline industry in more than a decade, further concentrating a US market already controlled by four major carriers. Together with Delta Air Lines and Southwest Airlines, the two companies already account for a substantial share of domestic and international passenger traffic.
According to aviation data from OAG, United and American ranked as the world’s two largest airlines by available seat capacity in 2025 when international operations are included. Kirby used this position to argue that a merger would create a stronger, more competitive US carrier capable of better challenging foreign airlines in long-haul markets.
He noted that a significant portion of long-haul flights into and out of the United States are operated by non-US carriers, despite the majority of passengers being American citizens. Kirby framed the proposed merger as a way to strengthen the competitive standing of US airlines globally and align with broader economic priorities, including addressing international trade imbalances.
The timing of the proposal came just days before the escalation of geopolitical tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, which triggered a sharp rise in jet fuel prices. The increase in operational costs has already forced airlines to adjust pricing strategies, including raising fares and introducing additional fees.
Despite the strategic arguments, industry analysts and regulatory experts have expressed strong skepticism about the feasibility of such a merger. Concerns centre on the potential reduction in competition, overlapping route networks, and the broader impact on ticket prices and consumer choice.
Opposition is expected from multiple fronts, including labour unions wary of job losses, competing airlines concerned about market dominance, lawmakers focused on antitrust implications, and airport authorities evaluating route concentration.
Antitrust lawyer Seth Bloom noted that the merger would likely face significant regulatory hurdles, even under an administration perceived to be more lenient on corporate consolidation. He pointed out that the current policy environment places a strong emphasis on protecting consumers from rising costs, and a merger of this scale could give airlines increased pricing power.
Sources close to the White House indicated that there is internal skepticism about the proposal, particularly given its potential impact on competition at a time when economic pressures on consumers remain high ahead of midterm elections.
Neither United Airlines nor American Airlines has confirmed any formal merger discussions, and it remains unclear whether any official proposal has been submitted or if talks have progressed beyond preliminary exploration. Both companies declined to comment, while the White House did not respond to requests for clarification.
Market reaction to the reports was immediate but measured. Shares of American Airlines rose by more than five percent in after-hours trading, reflecting investor optimism about a potential deal, while United Airlines shares showed little movement.
American Airlines continues to face pressure to improve its financial performance, particularly as it works to close the gap with competitors like United and Delta. The airline is also managing approximately $25 billion in long-term debt, which limits its financial flexibility during a period of elevated fuel costs.
United Airlines, on the other hand, has projected confidence in its ability to navigate current industry challenges. Kirby has previously suggested that prolonged cost pressures could create opportunities for stronger airlines to expand their market share as weaker competitors struggle.
The broader US airline industry remains highly concentrated, with the four largest carriers each controlling roughly 17 percent of domestic traffic, according to Department of Transportation data. Any move to merge two of these dominant players would fundamentally reshape the competitive landscape.
Erizia Rubyjeana
Follow us on:
