ON NOW Global Business Report
d

First HoldCo Attacking Press Freedom after Regulatory Breaches in Opaque N324bn Share Transaction, Say THISDAY, ARISE

THISDAY and ARISE accuse First HoldCo of harassment and attempts to gag the press over its opaque N324.47bn share transaction

The Boards of Editors of THISDAY-ARISE Media Group have condemned what they describe as an orchestrated campaign of intimidation and falsehoods by First HoldCo Plc, alleging that the financial holding company is attempting to silence legitimate journalism and evade regulatory scrutiny over a controversial N324.47 billion share transaction.

In a strongly worded press statement issued on Monday, the media group said First HoldCo, through a sponsored post in several publications, made “false claims of misrepresentation of facts” in an effort to undermine constitutionally protected press freedom.

“This is an attempt to trample on our constitutionally guaranteed free speech and the freedom of the press as the Fourth Estate of the Realm,” the statement read, citing Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of expression and the press.

The controversy centres on an off-market sale of 10.4 billion shares valued at N324.47 billion executed by First HoldCo Plc on Wednesday, 16 July 2025. According to THISDAY and ARISE, the transaction raises significant red flags and violates several provisions of Nigerian financial laws and disclosure regulations.

“First HoldCo Plc… has brazenly affronted Laws and Regulations of the Federal Republic of Nigeria put in place for good governance and transparency,” the statement said, pointing to breaches of rules set by the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Bank and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 2020.

Among the specific violations cited are the failure to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner, the use of a trustee or “bridge holder” to obscure share ownership, and a discrepancy in declared transaction value—with N324.47 billion reported off-market, but only N195 billion disclosed on the NGX.

The media organisations questioned the legality of the funding source, stating: “Who is this bridge holder? How much are they holding? Who provided the funds which markets are claiming to be First Bank’s? Can they deny or confirm this?”

They also cited Section 65 of BOFIA, which prohibits banks from financing the purchase of their own shares. “Any funding or financing arrangement involving the purchase of First HoldCo shares using credit from FirstBank would violate this section,” the statement said.

The press statement further noted that other Nigerian media outlets—including The Guardian, BusinessDay, MoneyCentral, Punch, and Daily Independent—had also reported on the transaction without receiving similar backlash, raising questions about First HoldCo’s motives.

“So, why is First Holdco Plc singling out ARISE and THISDAY media groups for such intimidation in an attempt to gag the press and evade accountability?” the editors asked. “The Nigerian media has only asked these questions because First Bank has not complied with Nigerian laws and regulations regarding full disclosure.”

The media houses defended their reports by pointing to First HoldCo’s own admission of using a “bridge holder,” which was later confirmed to be Stanbic IBTC Bank. They argued that this corroborated their findings and underlined the need for transparency in line with Nigerian laws.

The statement also addressed First HoldCo’s attempt to link the matter with an unrelated transaction involving General Hydrocarbons Ltd (GHL), which they described as a deflection.

“First Holdco refers to an unrelated transaction by a related entity: General Hydrocarbons Ltd claiming falsely that it’s being owed,” they stated. “First Bank used GHL assets to secure its loan of $400m from AMCON and has not paid… FBN went to court 3 times… and lost all three cases to GHL.”

Reiterating their constitutional right and professional responsibility to investigate such matters, the media group said: “It is the constitutional duty of the media to ask questions. And that is what we are asking. So instead of hiding and trying to intimidate the press… what we require is full disclosure from First Bank in line with Nigerian laws for market confidence.”

The statement concluded with a call for accountability and transparency.

The Statement reads in full:

THISDAY ARISE Media Group Respond to Harassment and Attack on Free Speech & Press Freedom by First HoldCo Plc

The attention of the editors of THISDAY and ARISE Media Group has been drawn to false claims of misrepresentation of facts by the Board and Management of First HoldCo Plc in a sponsored post in some publications in an attempt to trample on our constitutionally guaranteed free speech and the freedom of the press as the Fourth Estate of the Realm as enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) under the Right to Freedom of Expression and the Press states that:

“The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media shall at all times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this Chapter and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the Government to the people.”

First HoldCo Plc, in it latest market action, an off-market sale of 10.4 billion shares valued at N324.47 billion on Wednesday July 16th, 2025, has brazenly affronted Laws and Regulations of the Federal Republic of Nigeria put in place for good governance and transparency as follows:

The Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX)

Disclosure of Beneficial Ownership

• Any person acquiring 5% or more of a listed company’s shares (directly or indirectly) must be disclosed. Disclosure must include: identity of the beneficial owner; shareholding category (e.g., director, substantial shareholder, insider); and whether the holding is direct or via a trustee/nominee.

Material Transaction Disclosures

• The NGX requires timely and comprehensive disclosure of any transaction that involves a significant volume of shares or may materially impact investor perception or market price. Partial or delayed disclosure violates the principles of fair, orderly, and efficient markets.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Rule on Issuers’ Disclosure Obligations

• Listed companies must disclose material facts fully, frankly, and without omission. The SEC holds issuers accountable for any attempt to suppress, misrepresent, or under-report major transactions. The use of indirect vehicles (e.g., trustees, bridge holders) does not exempt issuers from disclosure obligations.

Bank and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) 2020

Section 7 – Acquisition of Significant Shareholding

• Any person or entity acquiring 5% or more of the shares in a bank or bank holding company must obtain prior written approval from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Approval is required again at higher thresholds: 10%, 20%, 25%, 50%, and 75%. Acquisitions made through nominees, proxies, trustees, or other indirect structures (such as a ‘Bridge Holder’) fall under this provision. So far, First Holdco plc has not demonstrated compliance with this provision to the NGX

Section 9 – Notification of Shareholding

• Once a 5% stake is acquired, both the acquiring party and the institution (First HoldCo) must formally notify the CBN of the change in shareholding structure. Again, First Holdco plc has not demonstrated this compliance to the markets

Section 27 – Disclosure and Transparency

• Financial institutions must disclose: their beneficial ownership structure; all related-party transactions; and any information that may materially affect stakeholders. Failure to provide full and frank disclosure is considered a violation of the Act.

Section 45 – Insider Lending and Conflicts of Interest

• Requires disclosure and regulatory approval for any transaction involving directors, officers, or related parties, especially if it affects control or ownership.

Section 65 – Prohibition on Lending Against Own Shares

• Explicitly prohibits any bank from granting loans or advances secured by its own shares. Any funding or financing arrangement involving the purchase of First HoldCo shares using credit from FirstBank would violate this section.

In line with the constitutional rights of the Nigerian media to ask questions, report facts and seek clarity where matters involving shareholders are opaque, other Nigerian media outlets have reported the following by First HoldCo Plc in its lack of transparency and full disclosure of it recent share sale to a trustee it described as a “Bridge Holder“ of First HoldCo Plc.

  1. The Guardian: “Otedola Tightens Grip on First Bank with 40% Stake Acquisition”
  2. BusinessDay: “Otedola Buys Out Otudeko, Increases Stake in First Bank to 36.7%.”
  3. MoneyCentral: “Otedola Increases FirstHoldCo Stake to 40% with Buyout of Otudeko.
  4. Punch: “ First Holdco’s N323.4bn Share Transaction Sparks Speculation over Otedola’s Stake”

In a July 18th letter written to the Chief Executive Officer of the NGX Regulation Ltd, First Holdco Plc referenced BusinessDay Newspaper’s reporting of the opaque off-market transaction.

So, why is First Holdco Plc singling out ARISE and THISDAY media groups for such intimidation in an attempt to gag the press and evade accountability?

The Nigeria media has only asked these questions because First Bank has not complied with Nigerian laws regarding full disclosure.

For instance, it has reported a N324.47 billion share acquisition of 10.4bn shares off market, but when it came to disclosure, it disclosed only N195 billion on the stock exchange contrary to Nigerian stock exchange rules that requires frank and full disclosures and no omission of facts that could disadvantage investors.

In asking these questions, First Bank has disclosed that there is a “Bridge Holder” confirming ARISE and THISDAY reports that the share acquisition was held by a trustee. A bridge holder, as described by First Bank, in simple language, is a trustee which was confirmed by the Attorney General to be Stanbic IBTC Bank.

So who is this bridge holder? How much are they holding? Who provided the funds which markets are claiming to be First Bank. Can they deny or confirm this?

Especially under the BOFIA Act, which says no bank shall grant any loans or advances on the security of its own shares. There are also Prudential Regulations on credit facilities granted by any bank to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers.

First Bank is also required by law to follow both CBN regulations and FCCPC rules. So far, these transactions have not demonforebearanceliance with these rules.

And it is the constitutional duty of the media to ask questions. And that is what we are asking. So instead of hiding and trying to intimidate the press and bully its practitioners, what we require is full disclosure from First Bank in line with Nigerian laws for market confidence. This especially at this time when the CBN has gone above and beyond to return the financial markets to orthodoxy and ended forebearance

Finally, First HoldCo refers to an unrelated transaction by a related entity: General Hydrocarbons Ltd claiming falsely that it’s being owed. First Bank used GHL assets to secure its loan of $400m from AMCON and has not paid nor has it met FBN’s commitments to GHL. FBN went to court 3 times before Justice Alagoa, Justice Dipeolu and Justice Obile, all of the Federal High Court and lost all three cases to GHL. The case is now in arbitration.

Signed: The Board of Editors, THISDAY/ARISE Media Group

Follow us on:

ON NOW Global Business Report
  • en