• en

Derek Chauvin Trial: Expert Says Use of Force on George Floyd ‘Justified’

A use-of-force expert has told a US jury that the former police officer accused of the murder of George Floyd was “justified” in pinning him to the ground.  Barry Brodd

A use-of-force expert has told a US jury that the former police officer accused of the murder of George Floyd was “justified” in pinning him to the ground. 

Barry Brodd told the trial in Minnesota that Derek Chauvin acted with “objective reasonableness”.

Mr Chauvin is on trial after he knelt on Mr Floyd’s neck during his arrest last May.

He has denied the charges.

Video of Mr Chauvin, who is white, kneeling on the neck of Mr Floyd, a black man, led to worldwide protests against racism and policing in the US.

Tensions in Minnesota are also running high after the fatal shooting on Sunday of another black man by a white police officer in a suburb only 10 miles (16 km) away from the court where Mr Chauvin’s trial is taking place.

On Tuesday, the court heard testimony from witnesses called by Mr Chauvin’s defence team.

Former police officer Mr Brodd told the court that “the imminent threat” posed by Floyd was a major factor in his detention.

“I felt that Derek Chauvin was justified and acting with objective reasonableness following Minneapolis police department policy and current standards of law enforcement in his interaction with George Floyd,” he said.

“From a police officer’s standpoint, you don’t have to wait for it to happen. You just have to have a reasonable fear that somebody is going to strike you, stab you, shoot you.”

Mr Brodd added: “It’s easy to sit in an office and judge an officer’s conduct. It’s more of a challenge to put yourself in the officer’s shoes, to try to make an evaluation through what they are feeling, what they’re sensing, the fear they have, and then make a determination.”

“No, it was not,” Mr Brodd replied.

He said that the crowd surrounding George Floyd during his arrest “posed an unknown threat” and drew Mr Chauvin’s attention away from Floyd.

Cross-examining Mr Brodd, the prosecution maintained that the dangers of positional asphyxia – not being able to breathe in a certain position – were well known.

“Would you agree that that’s something commonly understood in law enforcement?” prosecutor Steve Schleicher asked.

“Yes,” Mr Brodd replied, confirming it was not new information.

The trial also heard from Peter Chang, a Minneapolis Park Police officer who responded to the scene of Floyd’s arrest. The court was shown footage from his bodycam.

Mr Chang told the court the crowd of bystanders around Floyd was “very aggressive to the officers”.

“Did that cause you any concern?” Mr Nelson asked him.

“Concern for the officers’ safety, yes,” Mr Chang replied.

Shawanda Hill, an acquaintance of George Floyd, was compelled by the defence to testify on Tuesday.

She was sitting in the back seat of the car when Floyd was approached by store employees who confronted him over an alleged counterfeit $20 bill.

She said Floyd had earlier been “happy, normal, talking, alert”.

She said that he had offered to give her a ride and that she received a phone call while sitting in the car with Floyd.

While she was on the phone, she said Floyd suddenly fell asleep just before the employees came out to confront him.

She said she woke him again as the police arrived.

She said that as soon as Floyd woke up, the first thing he saw was an officer’s gun. Ms Hill said that he immediately grew distressed and started pleading with the officers not to kill him.

“Did he seem startled when the officer pulled a gun on him?” the prosecutor asks.

“Very,” she said.

Follow us on: